clk: qcom: gcc-sc7180: Use floor ops for the correct sdcc1 clk

While picking commit a8cd989 ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Warn about
overclocking SD/MMC") back to my tree I was surprised that it was
reporting warnings.  I thought I fixed those!  Looking closer at the
fix, I see that I totally bungled it (or at least I halfway bungled
it).  The SD card clock got fixed (and that was the one I was really
focused on fixing), but I totally adjusted the wrong clock for eMMC.
Sigh.  Let's fix my dumb mistake.

Now both SD and eMMC have floor for the "apps" clock.

This doesn't matter a lot for the final clock rate for HS400 eMMC but
could matter if someone happens to put some slower eMMC on a sc7180.
We also transition through some of these lower rates sometimes and
having them wrong could cause problems during these transitions.
These were the messages I was seeing at boot:
  mmc1: Card appears overclocked; req 52000000 Hz, actual 100000000 Hz
  mmc1: Card appears overclocked; req 52000000 Hz, actual 100000000 Hz
  mmc1: Card appears overclocked; req 104000000 Hz, actual 192000000 Hz

Fixes: 6d37a8d ("clk: qcom: gcc-sc7180: Use floor ops for sdcc clks")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210224095013.1.I2e2ba4978cfca06520dfb5d757768f9c42140f7c@changeid
Reviewed-by: Taniya Das <tdas@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>

drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-sc7180.c

@@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 gcc_sdcc1_apps_clk_src = {
 		.name = "gcc_sdcc1_apps_clk_src",
 		.parent_data = gcc_parent_data_1,
 		.num_parents = 5,
-		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
+		.ops = &clk_rcg2_floor_ops,
 	},
 };
 
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ static struct clk_rcg2 gcc_sdcc1_ice_core_clk_src = {
 		.name = "gcc_sdcc1_ice_core_clk_src",
 		.parent_data = gcc_parent_data_0,
 		.num_parents = 4,
-		.ops = &clk_rcg2_floor_ops,
+		.ops = &clk_rcg2_ops,
 	},
 };