Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
checkpatch: add optional static const to blank line declarations test
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Using a static const struct definition as part of a series of
declarations produces a false positive "Missing a blank line after
declarations" for code like:

  WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
  #710: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_scale_coefs.c:137:
  +       int inc;
  +       static const struct {

So fix it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5905126e70b0ed1781e49265fd5c49c5090d0223.camel@perches.com
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: Jyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
Joe Perches authored and Linus Torvalds committed Sep 4, 2018
1 parent 9c21dae commit 328b5f4
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion scripts/checkpatch.pl
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3311,7 +3311,7 @@ sub process {
# known declaration macros
$sline =~ /^\+\s+$declaration_macros/ ||
# start of struct or union or enum
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:static\s+)?(?:const\s+)?(?:union|struct|enum|typedef)\b/ ||
# start or end of block or continuation of declaration
$sline =~ /^\+\s+(?:$|[\{\}\.\#\"\?\:\(\[])/ ||
# bitfield continuation
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 328b5f4

Please sign in to comment.