mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exce…

…eded()

The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the
else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess.  So we could
replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with
else equally.  Also drop the comment which doesn't really explain much.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201012131607.10656-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/memcontrol.c

@@ -623,14 +623,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
 		if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess) {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_left;
 			rightmost = false;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
-		 * limit by the same amount
-		 */
-		else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
+		} else {
 			p = &(*p)->rb_right;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (rightmost)