i40e/i40evf: use logical operator

We shouldn't be using a bitwise operator here; it's not a bitwise operation. Use a logical operator instead. Why doesn't c have a logical-or-and-assign operator? Change-ID: Id84f3ca884910bed7073c84b1e16a102e958d0de Signed-off-by: Mitch Williams <mitch.a.williams@intel.com> Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
mariux64 · Dec 3, 2015 · 44cdb79 · 44cdb79
1 parent b82bc49
commit 44cdb79
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions.
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -1907,7 +1907,7 @@ int i40e_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	 */
 	i40e_for_each_ring(ring, q_vector->tx) {
 		clean_complete &= i40e_clean_tx_irq(ring, vsi->work_limit);
-		arm_wb |= ring->arm_wb;
+		arm_wb = arm_wb || ring->arm_wb;
 		ring->arm_wb = false;
 	}
 

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c
@@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ int i40evf_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	 */
 	i40e_for_each_ring(ring, q_vector->tx) {
 		clean_complete &= i40e_clean_tx_irq(ring, vsi->work_limit);
-		arm_wb |= ring->arm_wb;
+		arm_wb = arm_wb || ring->arm_wb;
 		ring->arm_wb = false;
 	}