x86: re-introduce support for ERMS copies for user space accesses

I tried to streamline our user memory copy code fairly aggressively in
commit adfcf42 ("x86: don't use REP_GOOD or ERMS for user memory
copies"), in order to then be able to clean up the code and inline the
modern FSRM case in commit 577e6a7 ("x86: inline the 'rep movs' in
user copies for the FSRM case").

We had reports [1] of that causing regressions earlier with blogbench,
but that turned out to be a horrible benchmark for that case, and not a
sufficient reason for re-instating "rep movsb" on older machines.

However, now Eric Dumazet reported [2] a regression in performance that
seems to be a rather more real benchmark, where due to the removal of
"rep movs" a TCP stream over a 100Gbps network no longer reaches line
speed.

And it turns out that with the simplified the calling convention for the
non-FSRM case in commit 427fda2 ("x86: improve on the non-rep
'copy_user' function"), re-introducing the ERMS case is actually fairly
simple.

Of course, that "fairly simple" is glossing over several missteps due to
having to fight our assembler alternative code.  This code really wanted
to rewrite a conditional branch to have two different targets, but that
made objtool sufficiently unhappy that this instead just ended up doing
a choice between "jump to the unrolled loop, or use 'rep movsb'
directly".

Let's see if somebody finds a case where the kernel memory copies also
care (see commit 68674f9: "x86: don't use REP_GOOD or ERMS for
small memory copies").  But Eric does argue that the user copies are
special because networking tries to copy up to 32KB at a time, if
order-3 pages allocations are possible.

In-kernel memory copies are typically small, unless they are the special
"copy pages at a time" kind that still use "rep movs".

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305041446.71d46724-yujie.liu@intel.com/ [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CANn89iKUbyrJ=r2+_kK+sb2ZSSHifFZ7QkPLDpAtkJ8v4WUumA@mail.gmail.com/ [2]
Reported-and-tested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Fixes: adfcf42 ("x86: don't use REP_GOOD or ERMS for user memory copies")
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

arch/x86/lib/copy_user_64.S

@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
  */
 
 #include <linux/linkage.h>
+#include <asm/cpufeatures.h>
+#include <asm/alternative.h>
 #include <asm/asm.h>
 #include <asm/export.h>
 
@@ -29,7 +31,7 @@
  */
 SYM_FUNC_START(rep_movs_alternative)
 	cmpq $64,%rcx
-	jae .Lunrolled
+	jae .Llarge
 
 	cmp $8,%ecx
 	jae .Lword
@@ -65,6 +67,12 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(rep_movs_alternative)
 	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA( 2b, .Lcopy_user_tail)
 	_ASM_EXTABLE_UA( 3b, .Lcopy_user_tail)
 
+.Llarge:
+0:	ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lunrolled", "rep movsb", X86_FEATURE_ERMS
+1:	RET
+
+        _ASM_EXTABLE_UA( 0b, 1b)
+
 	.p2align 4
 .Lunrolled:
 10:	movq (%rsi),%r8