locking/rwsem: Fix comments about reader optimistic lock stealing con…

…ditions

After the commit 617f3ef ("locking/rwsem: Remove reader
optimistic spinning"), reader doesn't support optimistic spinning
anymore, there is no need meet the condition which OSQ is empty.

BTW, add an unlikely() for the max reader wakeup check in the loop.

Signed-off-by: Yanfei Xu <yanfei.xu@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211013134154.1085649-4-yanfei.xu@windriver.com

kernel/locking/rwsem.c

@@ -56,7 +56,6 @@
  *
  * A fast path reader optimistic lock stealing is supported when the rwsem
  * is previously owned by a writer and the following conditions are met:
- *  - OSQ is empty
  *  - rwsem is not currently writer owned
  *  - the handoff isn't set.
  */
@@ -485,7 +484,7 @@ static void rwsem_mark_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
 		/*
 		 * Limit # of readers that can be woken up per wakeup call.
 		 */
-		if (woken >= MAX_READERS_WAKEUP)
+		if (unlikely(woken >= MAX_READERS_WAKEUP))
 			break;
 	}