Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
MIPS: scall64-o32: Fix indirect syscall detection
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Commit 4c21b8f (MIPS: seccomp: Handle indirect system calls (o32))
added indirect syscall detection for O32 processes running on MIPS64
but it did not work as expected. The reason is the the scall64-o32
implementation differs compared to scall32-o32. In the former, the v0
(syscall number) register contains the absolute syscall number
(4000 + X) whereas in the latter it contains the relative syscall
number (X). Fix the code to avoid doing an extra addition, and load
the v0 register directly to the first argument for syscall_trace_enter.
Moreover, set the .reorder assembler option in order to have better
control on this part of the assembly code.

Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
Patchwork: http://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/7481/
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+
Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
  • Loading branch information
Markos Chandras authored and Ralf Baechle committed Aug 19, 2014
1 parent 4038152 commit 5245689
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 4 deletions.
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions arch/mips/kernel/scall64-o32.S
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -113,15 +113,19 @@ trace_a_syscall:
move s0, t2 # Save syscall pointer
move a0, sp
/*
* syscall number is in v0 unless we called syscall(__NR_###)
* absolute syscall number is in v0 unless we called syscall(__NR_###)
* where the real syscall number is in a0
* note: NR_syscall is the first O32 syscall but the macro is
* only defined when compiling with -mabi=32 (CONFIG_32BIT)
* therefore __NR_O32_Linux is used (4000)
*/
addiu a1, v0, __NR_O32_Linux
bnez v0, 1f /* __NR_syscall at offset 0 */
lw a1, PT_R4(sp)
.set push
.set reorder
subu t1, v0, __NR_O32_Linux
move a1, v0
bnez t1, 1f /* __NR_syscall at offset 0 */
lw a1, PT_R4(sp) /* Arg1 for __NR_syscall case */
.set pop

1: jal syscall_trace_enter

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 5245689

Please sign in to comment.