-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge branch 'rhashtable-bit-locking-m68k'
NeilBrown says: ==================== Fix rhashtable bit-locking for m68k As reported by Guenter Roeck, the new rhashtable bit-locking doesn't work on m68k as it only requires 2-byte alignment, so BIT(1) is addresses is not unused. We current use BIT(0) to identify a NULLS marker, but that is only needed in ->next pointers. The bucket head does not need a NULLS marker, so the lsb there can be used for locking. the first 4 patches make some small improvements and re-arrange some code. The final patch converts to using only BIT(0) for these two different special purposes. I had previously suggested dropping the series until I fix it. Given that this was fairly easy, I retract that I think it best simply to add these patches to fix the code. ==================== Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
- Loading branch information
Showing
3 changed files
with
142 additions
and
110 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.