Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
x86/platform: Remove incorrect error message in x86_default_fixup_cpu…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…_id()

It's only called from amd.c:srat_detect_node(). The introduced
condition for calling the fixup code is true for all AMD
multi-node processors, e.g. Magny-Cours and Interlagos. There we
have 2 NUMA nodes on one socket. Thus there are cores having
different numa-node-id but with equal phys_proc_id.

There is no point to print error messages in such a situation.

The confusing/misleading error message was introduced with
commit 64be4c1 ("x86: Add
x86_init platform override to fix up NUMA core numbering").

Remove the default fixup function (especially the error message)
and replace it by a NULL pointer check, move the
Numascale-specific condition for calling the fixup into the
fixup-function itself and slightly adapt the comment.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Cc: <sp@numascale.com>
Cc: <bp@amd64.org>
Cc: <daniel@numascale-asia.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120402160648.GR27684@alberich.amd.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
Andreas Herrmann authored and Ingo Molnar committed Apr 16, 2012
1 parent b199430 commit 6889463
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 9 additions and 16 deletions.
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion arch/x86/include/asm/x86_init.h
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -195,6 +195,5 @@ extern struct x86_msi_ops x86_msi;

extern void x86_init_noop(void);
extern void x86_init_uint_noop(unsigned int unused);
extern void x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node);

#endif
7 changes: 5 additions & 2 deletions arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -207,8 +207,11 @@ static void __init map_csrs(void)

static void fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
{
c->phys_proc_id = node;
per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;

if (c->phys_proc_id != node) {
c->phys_proc_id = node;
per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, smp_processor_id()) = node;
}
}

static int __init numachip_system_init(void)
Expand Down
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -353,10 +353,11 @@ static void __cpuinit srat_detect_node(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
node = per_cpu(cpu_llc_id, cpu);

/*
* If core numbers are inconsistent, it's likely a multi-fabric platform,
* so invoke platform-specific handler
* On multi-fabric platform (e.g. Numascale NumaChip) a
* platform-specific handler needs to be called to fixup some
* IDs of the CPU.
*/
if (c->phys_proc_id != node)
if (x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id)
x86_cpuinit.fixup_cpu_id(c, node);

if (!node_online(node)) {
Expand Down
9 changes: 0 additions & 9 deletions arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1162,15 +1162,6 @@ static void dbg_restore_debug_regs(void)
#define dbg_restore_debug_regs()
#endif /* ! CONFIG_KGDB */

/*
* Prints an error where the NUMA and configured core-number mismatch and the
* platform didn't override this to fix it up
*/
void __cpuinit x86_default_fixup_cpu_id(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, int node)
{
pr_err("NUMA core number %d differs from configured core number %d\n", node, c->phys_proc_id);
}

/*
* cpu_init() initializes state that is per-CPU. Some data is already
* initialized (naturally) in the bootstrap process, such as the GDT
Expand Down
1 change: 0 additions & 1 deletion arch/x86/kernel/x86_init.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -93,7 +93,6 @@ struct x86_init_ops x86_init __initdata = {
struct x86_cpuinit_ops x86_cpuinit __cpuinitdata = {
.early_percpu_clock_init = x86_init_noop,
.setup_percpu_clockev = setup_secondary_APIC_clock,
.fixup_cpu_id = x86_default_fixup_cpu_id,
};

static void default_nmi_init(void) { };
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 6889463

Please sign in to comment.