Merge tag 'for-5.17-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ke…

…rnel/git/kdave/linux

Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba:

 - yield CPU more often when defragmenting a large file

 - skip defragmenting extents already under writeback

 - improve error message when send fails to write file data

 - get rid of warning when mounted with 'flushoncommit'

* tag 'for-5.17-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux:
  btrfs: send: in case of IO error log it
  btrfs: get rid of warning on transaction commit when using flushoncommit
  btrfs: defrag: don't try to defrag extents which are under writeback
  btrfs: don't hold CPU for too long when defragging a file

fs/btrfs/ioctl.c

@@ -1210,6 +1210,10 @@ static int defrag_collect_targets(struct btrfs_inode *inode,
 		if (em->generation < newer_than)
 			goto next;
 
+		/* This em is under writeback, no need to defrag */
+		if (em->generation == (u64)-1)
+			goto next;
+
 		/*
 		 * Our start offset might be in the middle of an existing extent
 		 * map, so take that into account.
@@ -1629,6 +1633,7 @@ int btrfs_defrag_file(struct inode *inode, struct file_ra_state *ra,
 			ret = 0;
 			break;
 		}
+		cond_resched();
 	}
 
 	if (ra_allocated)

fs/btrfs/send.c

@@ -4999,6 +4999,10 @@ static int put_file_data(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 offset, u32 len)
 			lock_page(page);
 			if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
 				unlock_page(page);
+				btrfs_err(fs_info,
+			"send: IO error at offset %llu for inode %llu root %llu",
+					page_offset(page), sctx->cur_ino,
+					sctx->send_root->root_key.objectid);
 				put_page(page);
 				ret = -EIO;
 				break;

fs/btrfs/transaction.c

@@ -1981,16 +1981,24 @@ static void btrfs_cleanup_pending_block_groups(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans)
 static inline int btrfs_start_delalloc_flush(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 {
 	/*
-	 * We use writeback_inodes_sb here because if we used
+	 * We use try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() here because if we used
 	 * btrfs_start_delalloc_roots we would deadlock with fs freeze.
 	 * Currently are holding the fs freeze lock, if we do an async flush
 	 * we'll do btrfs_join_transaction() and deadlock because we need to
 	 * wait for the fs freeze lock.  Using the direct flushing we benefit
 	 * from already being in a transaction and our join_transaction doesn't
 	 * have to re-take the fs freeze lock.
+	 *
+	 * Note that try_to_writeback_inodes_sb() will only trigger writeback
+	 * if it can read lock sb->s_umount. It will always be able to lock it,
+	 * except when the filesystem is being unmounted or being frozen, but in
+	 * those cases sync_filesystem() is called, which results in calling
+	 * writeback_inodes_sb() while holding a write lock on sb->s_umount.
+	 * Note that we don't call writeback_inodes_sb() directly, because it
+	 * will emit a warning if sb->s_umount is not locked.
 	 */
 	if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, FLUSHONCOMMIT))
-		writeback_inodes_sb(fs_info->sb, WB_REASON_SYNC);
+		try_to_writeback_inodes_sb(fs_info->sb, WB_REASON_SYNC);
 	return 0;
 }