Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
cpufreq: Avoid calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() from handle_upda…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…te()

On some occasions cpufreq_verify_current_freq() schedules a work whose
callback is handle_update(), which further calls cpufreq_update_policy()
which may end up calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() again.

On the other hand, when cpufreq_update_policy() is called from
handle_update(), the pointer to the cpufreq policy is already
available, but cpufreq_cpu_acquire() is still called to get it in
cpufreq_update_policy(), which should be avoided as well.

To fix these issues, create a new helper, refresh_frequency_limits(),
and make both handle_update() call it cpufreq_update_policy().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Rename reeval_frequency_limits() as refresh_frequency_limits() ]
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
  • Loading branch information
Viresh Kumar authored and Rafael J. Wysocki committed Jun 28, 2019
1 parent 5980752 commit 70a59fd
Showing 1 changed file with 16 additions and 10 deletions.
26 changes: 16 additions & 10 deletions drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1115,13 +1115,25 @@ static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cp
return ret;
}

static void refresh_frequency_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpufreq_policy new_policy = *policy;

pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", policy->cpu);

new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min;
new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max;

cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
}

static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy =
container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update);
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu);
cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);

pr_debug("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", policy->cpu);
refresh_frequency_limits(policy);
}

static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_policy_alloc(unsigned int cpu)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2376,7 +2388,6 @@ int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = cpufreq_cpu_acquire(cpu);
struct cpufreq_policy new_policy;

if (!policy)
return;
Expand All @@ -2389,12 +2400,7 @@ void cpufreq_update_policy(unsigned int cpu)
(cpufreq_suspended || WARN_ON(!cpufreq_verify_current_freq(policy, false))))
goto unlock;

pr_debug("updating policy for CPU %u\n", cpu);
memcpy(&new_policy, policy, sizeof(*policy));
new_policy.min = policy->user_policy.min;
new_policy.max = policy->user_policy.max;

cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
refresh_frequency_limits(policy);

unlock:
cpufreq_cpu_release(policy);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 70a59fd

Please sign in to comment.