Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge tag 'core-urgent-2021-06-24' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/li…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
…nux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull sigqueue cache fix from Ingo Molnar:
 "Fix a memory leak in the recently introduced sigqueue cache"

* tag 'core-urgent-2021-06-24' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  signal: Prevent sigqueue caching after task got released
  • Loading branch information
Linus Torvalds committed Jun 24, 2021
2 parents 6667517 + 399f8dd commit 7749b03
Showing 1 changed file with 16 additions and 1 deletion.
17 changes: 16 additions & 1 deletion kernel/signal.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -435,6 +435,12 @@ __sigqueue_alloc(int sig, struct task_struct *t, gfp_t gfp_flags,
* Preallocation does not hold sighand::siglock so it can't
* use the cache. The lockless caching requires that only
* one consumer and only one producer run at a time.
*
* For the regular allocation case it is sufficient to
* check @q for NULL because this code can only be called
* if the target task @t has not been reaped yet; which
* means this code can never observe the error pointer which is
* written to @t->sigqueue_cache in exit_task_sigqueue_cache().
*/
q = READ_ONCE(t->sigqueue_cache);
if (!q || sigqueue_flags)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -463,13 +469,18 @@ void exit_task_sigqueue_cache(struct task_struct *tsk)
struct sigqueue *q = tsk->sigqueue_cache;

if (q) {
tsk->sigqueue_cache = NULL;
/*
* Hand it back to the cache as the task might
* be self reaping which would leak the object.
*/
kmem_cache_free(sigqueue_cachep, q);
}

/*
* Set an error pointer to ensure that @tsk will not cache a
* sigqueue when it is reaping it's child tasks
*/
tsk->sigqueue_cache = ERR_PTR(-1);
}

static void sigqueue_cache_or_free(struct sigqueue *q)
Expand All @@ -481,6 +492,10 @@ static void sigqueue_cache_or_free(struct sigqueue *q)
* is intentional when run without holding current->sighand->siglock,
* which is fine as current obviously cannot run __sigqueue_free()
* concurrently.
*
* The NULL check is safe even if current has been reaped already,
* in which case exit_task_sigqueue_cache() wrote an error pointer
* into current->sigqueue_cache.
*/
if (!READ_ONCE(current->sigqueue_cache))
WRITE_ONCE(current->sigqueue_cache, q);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 7749b03

Please sign in to comment.