Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.12-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pu…

…b/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest

Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan

 - support for filtering test suites using glob from Daniel Latypov.

     "kunit_filter.glob" command line option is passed to the UML
     kernel, which currently only supports filtering by suite name.
     This support allows running different subsets of tests, e.g.

      $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build
      $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec 'list*'
      $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py exec 'kunit*'

 - several fixes and cleanups also from Daniel Latypov.

* tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-5.12-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest:
  kunit: tool: fix unintentional statefulness in run_kernel()
  kunit: tool: add support for filtering suites by glob
  kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites
  kunit: don't show `1 == 1` in failed assertion messages
  kunit: make kunit_tool accept optional path to .kunitconfig fragment
  Documentation: kunit: add tips.rst for small examples
  KUnit: Docs: make start.rst example Kconfig follow style.rst
  kunit: tool: simplify kconfig is_subset_of() logic
  minor: kunit: tool: fix unit test so it can run from non-root dir
  kunit: tool: use `with open()` in unit test
  kunit: tool: stop using bare asserts in unit test
  kunit: tool: fix unit test cleanup handling

Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst

@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ KUnit - Unit Testing for the Linux Kernel
 	api/index
 	style
 	faq
+	tips
 
 What is KUnit?
 ==============
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ How do I use it?
 ================
 
 *   :doc:`start` - for new users of KUnit
+*   :doc:`tips` - for short examples of best practices
 *   :doc:`usage` - for a more detailed explanation of KUnit features
 *   :doc:`api/index` - for the list of KUnit APIs used for testing
 *   :doc:`kunit-tool` - for more information on the kunit_tool helper script

Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst

@@ -196,8 +196,9 @@ Now add the following to ``drivers/misc/Kconfig``:
 .. code-block:: kconfig
 
 	config MISC_EXAMPLE_TEST
-		bool "Test for my example"
+		tristate "Test for my example" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 		depends on MISC_EXAMPLE && KUNIT=y
+		default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
 
 and the following to ``drivers/misc/Makefile``:
 
@@ -233,5 +234,7 @@ Congrats! You just wrote your first KUnit test!
 
 Next Steps
 ==========
-*   Check out the :doc:`usage` page for a more
+*   Check out the :doc:`tips` page for tips on
+    writing idiomatic KUnit tests.
+*   Optional: see the :doc:`usage` page for a more
     in-depth explanation of KUnit.

Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+============================
+Tips For Writing KUnit Tests
+============================
+
+Exiting early on failed expectations
+------------------------------------
+
+``KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ`` and friends will mark the test as failed and continue
+execution.  In some cases, it's unsafe to continue and you can use the
+``KUNIT_ASSERT`` variant to exit on failure.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void example_test_user_alloc_function(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		void *object = alloc_some_object_for_me();
+
+		/* Make sure we got a valid pointer back. */
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, object);
+		do_something_with_object(object);
+	}
+
+Allocating memory
+-----------------
+
+Where you would use ``kzalloc``, you should prefer ``kunit_kzalloc`` instead.
+KUnit will ensure the memory is freed once the test completes.
+
+This is particularly useful since it lets you use the ``KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ``
+macros to exit early from a test without having to worry about remembering to
+call ``kfree``.
+
+Example:
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	void example_test_allocation(struct kunit *test)
+	{
+		char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 16, GFP_KERNEL);
+		/* Ensure allocation succeeded. */
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
+
+		KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ(test, buffer, "");
+	}
+
+
+Testing static functions
+------------------------
+
+If you don't want to expose functions or variables just for testing, one option
+is to conditionally ``#include`` the test file at the end of your .c file, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* In my_file.c */
+
+	static int do_interesting_thing();
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
+	#include "my_kunit_test.c"
+	#endif
+
+Injecting test-only code
+------------------------
+
+Similarly to the above, it can be useful to add test-specific logic.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* In my_file.h */
+
+	#ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
+	/* Defined in my_kunit_test.c */
+	void test_only_hook(void);
+	#else
+	void test_only_hook(void) { }
+	#endif
+
+TODO(dlatypov@google.com): add an example of using ``current->kunit_test`` in
+such a hook when it's not only updated for ``CONFIG_KASAN=y``.
+
+Customizing error messages
+--------------------------
+
+Each of the ``KUNIT_EXPECT`` and ``KUNIT_ASSERT`` macros have a ``_MSG`` variant.
+These take a format string and arguments to provide additional context to the automatically generated error messages.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	char some_str[41];
+	generate_sha1_hex_string(some_str);
+
+	/* Before. Not easy to tell why the test failed. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, strlen(some_str), 40);
+
+	/* After. Now we see the offending string. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, strlen(some_str), 40, "some_str='%s'", some_str);
+
+Alternatively, one can take full control over the error message by using ``KUNIT_FAIL()``, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+	/* Before */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, some_setup_function(), 0);
+
+	/* After: full control over the failure message. */
+	if (some_setup_function())
+		KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to setup thing for testing");
+
+Next Steps
+==========
+*   Optional: see the :doc:`usage` page for a more
+    in-depth explanation of KUnit.

lib/kunit/Kconfig

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 menuconfig KUNIT
 	tristate "KUnit - Enable support for unit tests"
+	select GLOB if KUNIT=y
 	help
 	  Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit
 	  testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are

lib/kunit/assert.c

@@ -85,6 +85,29 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format);
 
+/* Checks if `text` is a literal representing `value`, e.g. "5" and 5 */
+static bool is_literal(struct kunit *test, const char *text, long long value,
+		       gfp_t gfp)
+{
+	char *buffer;
+	int len;
+	bool ret;
+
+	len = snprintf(NULL, 0, "%lld", value);
+	if (strlen(text) != len)
+		return false;
+
+	buffer = kunit_kmalloc(test, len+1, gfp);
+	if (!buffer)
+		return false;
+
+	snprintf(buffer, len+1, "%lld", value);
+	ret = strncmp(buffer, text, len) == 0;
+
+	kunit_kfree(test, buffer);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 				struct string_stream *stream)
 {
@@ -97,12 +120,16 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
 			  binary_assert->left_text,
 			  binary_assert->operation,
 			  binary_assert->right_text);
-	string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld\n",
-			  binary_assert->left_text,
-			  binary_assert->left_value);
-	string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld",
-			  binary_assert->right_text,
-			  binary_assert->right_value);
+	if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->left_text,
+			binary_assert->left_value, stream->gfp))
+		string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld\n",
+				  binary_assert->left_text,
+				  binary_assert->left_value);
+	if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->right_text,
+			binary_assert->right_value, stream->gfp))
+		string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld",
+				  binary_assert->right_text,
+				  binary_assert->right_value);
 	kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_assert_format);

lib/kunit/executor.c

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 
 #include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/glob.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
 
 /*
  * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in
@@ -11,14 +13,81 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[];
 
 #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT)
 
-static void kunit_print_tap_header(void)
+static char *filter_glob;
+module_param(filter_glob, charp, 0);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_glob,
+		"Filter which KUnit test suites run at boot-time, e.g. list*");
+
+static struct kunit_suite * const *
+kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite)
+{
+	int i, n = 0;
+	struct kunit_suite **filtered;
+
+	n = 0;
+	for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
+		if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
+			++n;
+	}
+
+	if (n == 0)
+		return NULL;
+
+	filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!filtered)
+		return NULL;
+
+	n = 0;
+	for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) {
+		if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name))
+			filtered[n++] = subsuite[i];
+	}
+	filtered[n] = NULL;
+
+	return filtered;
+}
+
+struct suite_set {
+	struct kunit_suite * const * const *start;
+	struct kunit_suite * const * const *end;
+};
+
+static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite;
+	struct suite_set filtered;
+
+	const size_t max = __kunit_suites_end - __kunit_suites_start;
+
+	if (!filter_glob) {
+		filtered.start = __kunit_suites_start;
+		filtered.end = __kunit_suites_end;
+		return filtered;
+	}
+
+	copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL);
+	filtered.start = copy;
+	if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */
+		filtered.end = copy;
+		return filtered;
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) {
+		filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(__kunit_suites_start[i]);
+		if (filtered_subsuite)
+			*copy++ = filtered_subsuite;
+	}
+	filtered.end = copy;
+	return filtered;
+}
+
+static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite;
 	int num_of_suites = 0;
 
-	for (suites = __kunit_suites_start;
-	     suites < __kunit_suites_end;
-	     suites++)
+	for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++)
 		for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++)
 			num_of_suites++;
 
@@ -30,12 +99,18 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void)
 {
 	struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites;
 
-	kunit_print_tap_header();
+	struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites();
+
+	kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set);
+
+	for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
+		__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
 
-	for (suites = __kunit_suites_start;
-	     suites < __kunit_suites_end;
-	     suites++)
-			__kunit_test_suites_init(*suites);
+	if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */
+		for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++)
+			kfree(*suites);
+		kfree(suite_set.start);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }