drm/i915: Remove redundant parameter to i915_gem_object_wait_renderin…

…g__tail()

An earlier commit (c8725f3: Do not call
retire_requests from wait_for_rendering) removed the use of the ring parameter
within wait_rendering__tail() but did not remove the parameter itself. As the
plan is to remove obj->ring which is where this parameter comes from, it is
simpler to just remove the parameter completely than to update it with a new
source.

For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
CC: Brad Volkin <bradley.d.volkin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c

@@ -1281,8 +1281,7 @@ i915_wait_seqno(struct intel_engine_cs *ring, uint32_t seqno)
 }
 
 static int
-i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
-				     struct intel_engine_cs *ring)
+i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 {
 	if (!obj->active)
 		return 0;
@@ -1319,7 +1318,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring);
+	return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj);
 }
 
 /* A nonblocking variant of the above wait. This is a highly dangerous routine
@@ -1359,7 +1358,7 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__nonblocking(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
-	return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj, ring);
+	return i915_gem_object_wait_rendering__tail(obj);
 }
 
 /**