-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
rxrpc: Kill off the rxrpc_transport struct
The rxrpc_transport struct is now redundant, given that the rxrpc_peer struct is now per peer port rather than per peer host, so get rid of it. Service connection lists are transferred to the rxrpc_peer struct, as is the conn_lock. Previous patches moved the client connection handling out of the rxrpc_transport struct and discarded the connection bundling code. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
- Loading branch information
David Howells
committed
Jun 22, 2016
1 parent
999b69f
commit aa390bb
Showing
11 changed files
with
65 additions
and
451 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.