workqueue: Control intensive warning threshold through cmdline

When CONFIG_WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE_REPORT is set, the kernel will report
the work functions which violate the intensive_threshold_us repeatedly.
And now, only when the violate times exceed 4 and is a power of 2,
the kernel warning could be triggered.

However, sometimes, even if a long work execution time occurs only once,
it may cause other work to be delayed for a long time. This may also
cause some problems sometimes.

In order to freely control the threshold of warninging, a boot argument
is added so that the user can control the warning threshold to be printed.
At the same time, keep the exponential backoff to prevent reporting too much.

By default, the warning threshold is 4.

tj: Updated kernel-parameters.txt description.

Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan@unisoc.com>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>

Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt

@@ -7219,6 +7219,15 @@
 			threshold repeatedly. They are likely good
 			candidates for using WQ_UNBOUND workqueues instead.
 
+	workqueue.cpu_intensive_warning_thresh=<uint>
+			If CONFIG_WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE_REPORT is set, the kernel
+			will report the work functions which violate the
+			intensive_threshold_us repeatedly. In order to prevent
+			spurious warnings, start printing only after a work
+			function has violated this threshold number of times.
+
+			The default is 4 times. 0 disables the warning.
+
 	workqueue.power_efficient
 			Per-cpu workqueues are generally preferred because
 			they show better performance thanks to cache

kernel/workqueue.c

@@ -409,6 +409,10 @@ static const char *wq_affn_names[WQ_AFFN_NR_TYPES] = {
  */
 static unsigned long wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us = ULONG_MAX;
 module_param_named(cpu_intensive_thresh_us, wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us, ulong, 0644);
+#ifdef CONFIG_WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE_REPORT
+static unsigned int wq_cpu_intensive_warning_thresh = 4;
+module_param_named(cpu_intensive_warning_thresh, wq_cpu_intensive_warning_thresh, uint, 0644);
+#endif
 
 /* see the comment above the definition of WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT */
 static bool wq_power_efficient = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT_DEFAULT);
@@ -1327,11 +1331,13 @@ static void wq_cpu_intensive_report(work_func_t func)
 		u64 cnt;
 
 		/*
-		 * Start reporting from the fourth time and back off
+		 * Start reporting from the warning_thresh and back off
 		 * exponentially.
 		 */
 		cnt = atomic64_inc_return_relaxed(&ent->cnt);
-		if (cnt >= 4 && is_power_of_2(cnt))
+		if (wq_cpu_intensive_warning_thresh &&
+		    cnt >= wq_cpu_intensive_warning_thresh &&
+		    is_power_of_2(cnt + 1 - wq_cpu_intensive_warning_thresh))
 			printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING "workqueue: %ps hogged CPU for >%luus %llu times, consider switching to WQ_UNBOUND\n",
 					ent->func, wq_cpu_intensive_thresh_us,
 					atomic64_read(&ent->cnt));
@@ -1360,10 +1366,12 @@ static void wq_cpu_intensive_report(work_func_t func)
 
 	ent = &wci_ents[wci_nr_ents++];
 	ent->func = func;
-	atomic64_set(&ent->cnt, 1);
+	atomic64_set(&ent->cnt, 0);
 	hash_add_rcu(wci_hash, &ent->hash_node, (unsigned long)func);
 
 	raw_spin_unlock(&wci_lock);
+
+	goto restart;
 }
 
 #else	/* CONFIG_WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE_REPORT */