iommu/arm-smmu: Allow building as a module

By conditionally dropping support for the legacy binding and exporting
the newly introduced 'arm_smmu_impl_init()' function we can allow the
ARM SMMU driver to be built as a module.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Tested-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com> # smmu v3
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

drivers/iommu/Kconfig

@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ config SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU
 
 # ARM IOMMU support
 config ARM_SMMU
-	bool "ARM Ltd. System MMU (SMMU) Support"
+	tristate "ARM Ltd. System MMU (SMMU) Support"
 	depends on (ARM64 || ARM) && MMU
 	select IOMMU_API
 	select IOMMU_IO_PGTABLE_LPAE
@@ -368,6 +368,18 @@ config ARM_SMMU
 	  Say Y here if your SoC includes an IOMMU device implementing
 	  the ARM SMMU architecture.
 
+config ARM_SMMU_LEGACY_DT_BINDINGS
+	bool "Support the legacy \"mmu-masters\" devicetree bindings"
+	depends on ARM_SMMU=y && OF
+	help
+	  Support for the badly designed and deprecated "mmu-masters"
+	  devicetree bindings. This allows some DMA masters to attach
+	  to the SMMU but does not provide any support via the DMA API.
+	  If you're lucky, you might be able to get VFIO up and running.
+
+	  If you say Y here then you'll make me very sad. Instead, say N
+	  and move your firmware to the utopian future that was 2016.
+
 config ARM_SMMU_DISABLE_BYPASS_BY_DEFAULT
 	bool "Default to disabling bypass on ARM SMMU v1 and v2"
 	depends on ARM_SMMU

drivers/iommu/Makefile

@@ -14,7 +14,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MSM_IOMMU) += msm_iommu.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU) += amd_iommu.o amd_iommu_init.o amd_iommu_quirks.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_DEBUGFS) += amd_iommu_debugfs.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU_V2) += amd_iommu_v2.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU) += arm-smmu.o arm-smmu-impl.o arm-smmu-qcom.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU) += arm-smmu-mod.o
+arm-smmu-mod-objs += arm-smmu.o arm-smmu-impl.o arm-smmu-qcom.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3) += arm-smmu-v3.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DMAR_TABLE) += dmar.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU) += intel-iommu.o intel-pasid.o

drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c

@@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ static struct arm_smmu_domain *to_smmu_domain(struct iommu_domain *dom)
 	return container_of(dom, struct arm_smmu_domain, domain);
 }
 
+static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver;
+static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_LEGACY_DT_BINDINGS
+static int arm_smmu_bus_init(struct iommu_ops *ops);
+
 static struct device_node *dev_get_dev_node(struct device *dev)
 {
 	if (dev_is_pci(dev)) {
@@ -161,9 +167,6 @@ static int __find_legacy_master_phandle(struct device *dev, void *data)
 	return err == -ENOENT ? 0 : err;
 }
 
-static struct platform_driver arm_smmu_driver;
-static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops;
-
 static int arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(struct device *dev,
 					   struct arm_smmu_device **smmu)
 {
@@ -215,6 +218,27 @@ static int arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(struct device *dev,
 	return err;
 }
 
+/*
+ * With the legacy DT binding in play, we have no guarantees about
+ * probe order, but then we're also not doing default domains, so we can
+ * delay setting bus ops until we're sure every possible SMMU is ready,
+ * and that way ensure that no add_device() calls get missed.
+ */
+static int arm_smmu_legacy_bus_init(void)
+{
+	if (using_legacy_binding)
+		return arm_smmu_bus_init(&arm_smmu_ops);
+	return 0;
+}
+device_initcall_sync(arm_smmu_legacy_bus_init);
+#else
+static int arm_smmu_register_legacy_master(struct device *dev,
+					   struct arm_smmu_device **smmu)
+{
+	return -ENODEV;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_LEGACY_DT_BINDINGS */
+
 static int __arm_smmu_alloc_bitmap(unsigned long *map, int start, int end)
 {
 	int idx;
@@ -1599,6 +1623,7 @@ static struct iommu_ops arm_smmu_ops = {
 	.get_resv_regions	= arm_smmu_get_resv_regions,
 	.put_resv_regions	= arm_smmu_put_resv_regions,
 	.pgsize_bitmap		= -1UL, /* Restricted during device attach */
+	.owner			= THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
 static void arm_smmu_device_reset(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
@@ -1993,8 +2018,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_dt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
 
 	legacy_binding = of_find_property(dev->of_node, "mmu-masters", NULL);
 	if (legacy_binding && !using_generic_binding) {
-		if (!using_legacy_binding)
-			pr_notice("deprecated \"mmu-masters\" DT property in use; DMA API support unavailable\n");
+		if (!using_legacy_binding) {
+			pr_notice("deprecated \"mmu-masters\" DT property in use; %s support unavailable\n",
+				  IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_LEGACY_DT_BINDINGS) ? "DMA API" : "SMMU");
+		}
 		using_legacy_binding = true;
 	} else if (!legacy_binding && !using_legacy_binding) {
 		using_generic_binding = true;
@@ -2028,7 +2055,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_bus_init(struct iommu_ops *ops)
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI
 	if (!iommu_present(&pci_bus_type)) {
-		pci_request_acs();
 		err = bus_set_iommu(&pci_bus_type, ops);
 		if (err)
 			goto err_reset_amba_ops;
@@ -2204,20 +2230,6 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/*
- * With the legacy DT binding in play, though, we have no guarantees about
- * probe order, but then we're also not doing default domains, so we can
- * delay setting bus ops until we're sure every possible SMMU is ready,
- * and that way ensure that no add_device() calls get missed.
- */
-static int arm_smmu_legacy_bus_init(void)
-{
-	if (using_legacy_binding)
-		return arm_smmu_bus_init(&arm_smmu_ops);
-	return 0;
-}
-device_initcall_sync(arm_smmu_legacy_bus_init);
-
 static int arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);