octeontx2-af: Mailbox changes for 98xx CPT block

This patch changes CPT mailbox message format to
support new block CPT1 in 98xx silicon.

cpt_rd_wr_reg ->
    Modify cpt_rd_wr_reg mailbox and its handler to
    accommodate new block CPT1.
cpt_lf_alloc ->
    Modify cpt_lf_alloc mailbox and its handler to
    configure LFs from a block address out of multiple
    blocks of same type. If a PF/VF needs to configure
    LFs from both the blocks then this mbox should be
    called twice.

Signed-off-by: Mahipal Challa <mchalla@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Srujana Challa <schalla@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mbox.h

@@ -1073,13 +1073,15 @@ struct cpt_rd_wr_reg_msg {
 	u64 *ret_val;
 	u64 val;
 	u8 is_write;
+	int blkaddr;
 };
 
 struct cpt_lf_alloc_req_msg {
 	struct mbox_msghdr hdr;
 	u16 nix_pf_func;
 	u16 sso_pf_func;
 	u16 eng_grpmsk;
+	int blkaddr;
 };
 
 #endif /* MBOX_H */

drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/rvu_cpt.c

@@ -65,13 +65,13 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_alloc(struct rvu *rvu,
 	int num_lfs, slot;
 	u64 val;
 
+	blkaddr = req->blkaddr ? req->blkaddr : BLKADDR_CPT0;
+	if (blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT0 && blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT1)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
 	if (req->eng_grpmsk == 0x0)
 		return CPT_AF_ERR_GRP_INVALID;
 
-	blkaddr = rvu_get_blkaddr(rvu, BLKTYPE_CPT, 0);
-	if (blkaddr < 0)
-		return blkaddr;
-
 	block = &rvu->hw->block[blkaddr];
 	num_lfs = rvu_get_rsrc_mapcount(rvu_get_pfvf(rvu, pcifunc),
 					block->addr);
@@ -114,23 +114,17 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_alloc(struct rvu *rvu,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req,
-				 struct msg_rsp *rsp)
+static int cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req, int blkaddr)
 {
 	u16 pcifunc = req->hdr.pcifunc;
+	int num_lfs, cptlf, slot;
 	struct rvu_block *block;
-	int cptlf, blkaddr;
-	int num_lfs, slot;
-
-	blkaddr = rvu_get_blkaddr(rvu, BLKTYPE_CPT, 0);
-	if (blkaddr < 0)
-		return blkaddr;
 
 	block = &rvu->hw->block[blkaddr];
 	num_lfs = rvu_get_rsrc_mapcount(rvu_get_pfvf(rvu, pcifunc),
 					block->addr);
 	if (!num_lfs)
-		return CPT_AF_ERR_LF_INVALID;
+		return 0;
 
 	for (slot = 0; slot < num_lfs; slot++) {
 		cptlf = rvu_get_lf(rvu, block, pcifunc, slot);
@@ -146,6 +140,21 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_lf_free(struct rvu *rvu, struct msg_req *req,
+				 struct msg_rsp *rsp)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = cpt_lf_free(rvu, req, BLKADDR_CPT0);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (is_block_implemented(rvu->hw, BLKADDR_CPT1))
+		ret = cpt_lf_free(rvu, req, BLKADDR_CPT1);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static bool is_valid_offset(struct rvu *rvu, struct cpt_rd_wr_reg_msg *req)
 {
 	u64 offset = req->reg_offset;
@@ -208,9 +217,9 @@ int rvu_mbox_handler_cpt_rd_wr_register(struct rvu *rvu,
 {
 	int blkaddr;
 
-	blkaddr = rvu_get_blkaddr(rvu, BLKTYPE_CPT, 0);
-	if (blkaddr < 0)
-		return blkaddr;
+	blkaddr = req->blkaddr ? req->blkaddr : BLKADDR_CPT0;
+	if (blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT0 && blkaddr != BLKADDR_CPT1)
+		return -ENODEV;
 
 	/* This message is accepted only if sent from CPT PF/VF */
 	if (!is_cpt_pf(rvu, req->hdr.pcifunc) &&