tracing: not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again

After the previous cleanup, DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT's definition has no relationship with DEFINE_EVENT. So After we re-define DEFINE_EVENT, it is not necessary to define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT to be empty again. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200612092844.56107-5-richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
mariux64 · Jun 30, 2020 · e6bc5b3 · e6bc5b3
1 parent 61df16f
commit e6bc5b3
Showing 1 changed file with 0 additions and 3 deletions.
diff --git a/include/trace/trace_events.h b/include/trace/trace_events.h
@@ -709,9 +709,6 @@ static inline void ftrace_test_probe_##call(void)			\
 	check_trace_callback_type_##call(trace_event_raw_event_##template); \
 }
 
-#undef DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT
-#define DEFINE_EVENT_PRINT(template, name, proto, args, print)
-
 #include TRACE_INCLUDE(TRACE_INCLUDE_FILE)
 
 #undef __entry