iommu/vt-d: Remove domain_update_iommu_snooping()

The IOMMU force snooping capability is not required to be consistent
among all the IOMMUs anymore. Remove force snooping capability check
in the IOMMU hot-add path and domain_update_iommu_snooping() becomes
a dead code now.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220508123525.1973626-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220510023407.2759143-8-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>

drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c

@@ -533,33 +533,6 @@ static void domain_update_iommu_coherency(struct dmar_domain *domain)
 	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
-static bool domain_update_iommu_snooping(struct intel_iommu *skip)
-{
-	struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
-	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
-	bool ret = true;
-
-	rcu_read_lock();
-	for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
-		if (iommu != skip) {
-			/*
-			 * If the hardware is operating in the scalable mode,
-			 * the snooping control is always supported since we
-			 * always set PASID-table-entry.PGSNP bit if the domain
-			 * is managed outside (UNMANAGED).
-			 */
-			if (!sm_supported(iommu) &&
-			    !ecap_sc_support(iommu->ecap)) {
-				ret = false;
-				break;
-			}
-		}
-	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static int domain_update_iommu_superpage(struct dmar_domain *domain,
 					 struct intel_iommu *skip)
 {
@@ -3572,12 +3545,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_add(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru)
 			iommu->name);
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}
-	if (!ecap_sc_support(iommu->ecap) &&
-	    domain_update_iommu_snooping(iommu)) {
-		pr_warn("%s: Doesn't support snooping.\n",
-			iommu->name);
-		return -ENXIO;
-	}
+
 	sp = domain_update_iommu_superpage(NULL, iommu) - 1;
 	if (sp >= 0 && !(cap_super_page_val(iommu->cap) & (1 << sp))) {
 		pr_warn("%s: Doesn't support large page.\n",