Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
bonding: do failover when high prio link up
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Currently, when a high prio link enslaved, or when current link down,
the high prio port could be selected. But when high prio link up, the
new active slave reselection is not triggered. Fix it by checking link's
prio when getting up. Making the do_failover after looping all slaves as
there may be multi high prio slaves up.

Reported-by: Liang Li <liali@redhat.com>
Fixes: 0a2ff7c ("Bonding: add per-port priority for failover re-selection")
Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
Hangbin Liu authored and Jakub Kicinski committed Dec 14, 2022
1 parent 3d0b738 commit e95cc44
Showing 1 changed file with 15 additions and 9 deletions.
24 changes: 15 additions & 9 deletions drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2654,8 +2654,9 @@ static void bond_miimon_link_change(struct bonding *bond,

static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
{
struct list_head *iter;
struct slave *slave, *primary;
bool do_failover = false;
struct list_head *iter;

bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
switch (slave->link_new_state) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2699,8 +2700,9 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)

bond_miimon_link_change(bond, slave, BOND_LINK_UP);

if (!rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave) || slave == primary)
goto do_failover;
if (!rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave) || slave == primary ||
slave->prio > rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)->prio)
do_failover = true;

continue;

Expand All @@ -2721,7 +2723,7 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
bond_miimon_link_change(bond, slave, BOND_LINK_DOWN);

if (slave == rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave))
goto do_failover;
do_failover = true;

continue;

Expand All @@ -2732,8 +2734,9 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)

continue;
}
}

do_failover:
if (do_failover) {
block_netpoll_tx();
bond_select_active_slave(bond);
unblock_netpoll_tx();
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3531,6 +3534,7 @@ static int bond_ab_arp_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
*/
static void bond_ab_arp_commit(struct bonding *bond)
{
bool do_failover = false;
struct list_head *iter;
unsigned long last_tx;
struct slave *slave;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3560,8 +3564,9 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_commit(struct bonding *bond)
slave_info(bond->dev, slave->dev, "link status definitely up\n");

if (!rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave) ||
slave == rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave))
goto do_failover;
slave == rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave) ||
slave->prio > rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)->prio)
do_failover = true;

}

Expand All @@ -3580,7 +3585,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_commit(struct bonding *bond)

if (slave == rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->current_arp_slave, NULL);
goto do_failover;
do_failover = true;
}

continue;
Expand All @@ -3604,8 +3609,9 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_commit(struct bonding *bond)
slave->link_new_state);
continue;
}
}

do_failover:
if (do_failover) {
block_netpoll_tx();
bond_select_active_slave(bond);
unblock_netpoll_tx();
Expand Down

0 comments on commit e95cc44

Please sign in to comment.