Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
xen-pciback: redo VF placement in the virtual topology
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
The commit referenced below was incomplete: It merely affected what
would get written to the vdev-<N> xenstore node. The guest would still
find the function at the original function number as long as
__xen_pcibk_get_pci_dev() wouldn't be in sync. The same goes for AER wrt
__xen_pcibk_get_pcifront_dev().

Undo overriding the function to zero and instead make sure that VFs at
function zero remain alone in their slot. This has the added benefit of
improving overall capacity, considering that there's only a total of 32
slots available right now (PCI segment and bus can both only ever be
zero at present).

This is upstream commit 4ba50e7.

Fixes: 8a5248f ("xen PV passthru: assign SR-IOV virtual functions to 
separate virtual slots")
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8def783b-404c-3452-196d-3f3fd4d72c9e@suse.com
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
Jan Beulich authored and Greg Kroah-Hartman committed Jun 10, 2021
1 parent b5cd7f2 commit ed6a024
Showing 1 changed file with 8 additions and 6 deletions.
14 changes: 8 additions & 6 deletions drivers/xen/xen-pciback/vpci.c
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
struct pci_dev *dev, int devid,
publish_pci_dev_cb publish_cb)
{
int err = 0, slot, func = -1;
int err = 0, slot, func = PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
struct pci_dev_entry *t, *dev_entry;
struct vpci_dev_data *vpci_dev = pdev->pci_dev_data;

Expand All @@ -94,23 +94,26 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,

/*
* Keep multi-function devices together on the virtual PCI bus, except
* virtual functions.
* that we want to keep virtual functions at func 0 on their own. They
* aren't multi-function devices and hence their presence at func 0
* may cause guests to not scan the other functions.
*/
if (!dev->is_virtfn) {
if (!dev->is_virtfn || func) {
for (slot = 0; slot < PCI_SLOT_MAX; slot++) {
if (list_empty(&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]))
continue;

t = list_entry(list_first(&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]),
struct pci_dev_entry, list);
if (t->dev->is_virtfn && !PCI_FUNC(t->dev->devfn))
continue;

if (match_slot(dev, t->dev)) {
pr_info("vpci: %s: assign to virtual slot %d func %d\n",
pci_name(dev), slot,
PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn));
func);
list_add_tail(&dev_entry->list,
&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]);
func = PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
goto unlock;
}
}
Expand All @@ -123,7 +126,6 @@ static int __xen_pcibk_add_pci_dev(struct xen_pcibk_device *pdev,
pci_name(dev), slot);
list_add_tail(&dev_entry->list,
&vpci_dev->dev_list[slot]);
func = dev->is_virtfn ? 0 : PCI_FUNC(dev->devfn);
goto unlock;
}
}
Expand Down

0 comments on commit ed6a024

Please sign in to comment.