Merge 3.15 bugfixes for 3.16

fs/nfsd/nfs4acl.c

@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@ posix_state_to_acl(struct posix_acl_state *state, unsigned int flags)
 		add_to_mask(state, &state->groups->aces[i].perms);
 	}
 
-	if (!state->users->n && !state->groups->n) {
+	if (state->users->n || state->groups->n) {
 		pace++;
 		pace->e_tag = ACL_MASK;
 		low_mode_from_nfs4(state->mask.allow, &pace->e_perm, flags);

fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c

@@ -3716,9 +3716,16 @@ nfs4_preprocess_stateid_op(struct net *net, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
 static __be32
 nfsd4_free_lock_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid *stp)
 {
-	if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lockowner(stp->st_stateowner)))
+	struct nfs4_lockowner *lo = lockowner(stp->st_stateowner);
+
+	if (check_for_locks(stp->st_file, lo))
 		return nfserr_locks_held;
-	release_lock_stateid(stp);
+	/*
+	 * Currently there's a 1-1 lock stateid<->lockowner
+	 * correspondance, and we have to delete the lockowner when we
+	 * delete the lock stateid:
+	 */
+	unhash_lockowner(lo);
 	return nfs_ok;
 }
 
@@ -4158,6 +4165,10 @@ static bool same_lockowner_ino(struct nfs4_lockowner *lo, struct inode *inode, c
 
 	if (!same_owner_str(&lo->lo_owner, owner, clid))
 		return false;
+	if (list_empty(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids)) {
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+		return false;
+	}
 	lst = list_first_entry(&lo->lo_owner.so_stateids,
 			       struct nfs4_ol_stateid, st_perstateowner);
 	return lst->st_file->fi_inode == inode;