Skip to content

clade for GO terms? #187

Open
proost opened this issue Jun 14, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

clade for GO terms? #187

proost opened this issue Jun 14, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@proost
Copy link
Owner

proost commented Jun 14, 2017

Analogous with gene families and InterPro domains, GO terms can also be assigned to a clade

Could easily be implemented.

@proost proost closed this as completed Jun 21, 2017
@proost proost reopened this Jun 21, 2017
@proost proost added the question label Sep 7, 2017
@proost proost changed the title clade for GO terms clade for GO terms? Sep 7, 2017
@proost
Copy link
Owner Author

proost commented Sep 19, 2017

A reason not to do this is that lacking GO terms are often due to a lack of annotation. @mutwil ?

@mutwil
Copy link
Collaborator

mutwil commented Sep 21, 2017

I guess it's a somewhat interesting analysis, but I think only a handful of people would be interested in that. Skip if too complicated.

@proost proost removed the question label Nov 9, 2017
@proost proost added this to the CoNekT 2.0 milestone Nov 9, 2017
Sign in to join this conversation on GitHub.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants