-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge branch 'hsr-fix-lock-warnings'
Hangbin Liu says: ==================== hsr: fix lock warnings hsr_for_each_port is called in many places without holding the RCU read lock, this may trigger warnings on debug kernels like: [ 40.457015] [ T201] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage [ 40.457020] [ T201] 6.17.0-rc2-virtme #1 Not tainted [ 40.457025] [ T201] ----------------------------- [ 40.457029] [ T201] net/hsr/hsr_main.c:137 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! [ 40.457036] [ T201] other info that might help us debug this: [ 40.457040] [ T201] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 [ 40.457045] [ T201] 2 locks held by ip/201: [ 40.457050] [ T201] #0: ffffffff93040a40 (&ops->srcu){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: rtnl_link_ops_get+0xf2/0x280 [ 40.457080] [ T201] #1: ffffffff92e7f968 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_newlink+0x5e1/0xb20 [ 40.457102] [ T201] stack backtrace: [ 40.457108] [ T201] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 201 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.17.0-rc2-virtme #1 PREEMPT(full) [ 40.457114] [ T201] Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 40.457117] [ T201] Call Trace: [ 40.457120] [ T201] <TASK> [ 40.457126] [ T201] dump_stack_lvl+0x6f/0xb0 [ 40.457136] [ T201] lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold+0x4f/0xb1 [ 40.457148] [ T201] hsr_port_get_hsr+0xfe/0x140 [ 40.457158] [ T201] hsr_add_port+0x192/0x940 [ 40.457167] [ T201] ? __pfx_hsr_add_port+0x10/0x10 [ 40.457176] [ T201] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x5c/0x270 [ 40.457189] [ T201] hsr_dev_finalize+0x4bc/0xbf0 [ 40.457204] [ T201] hsr_newlink+0x3c3/0x8f0 [ 40.457212] [ T201] ? __pfx_hsr_newlink+0x10/0x10 [ 40.457222] [ T201] ? rtnl_create_link+0x173/0xe40 [ 40.457233] [ T201] rtnl_newlink_create+0x2cf/0x750 [ 40.457243] [ T201] ? __pfx_rtnl_newlink_create+0x10/0x10 [ 40.457247] [ T201] ? __dev_get_by_name+0x12/0x50 [ 40.457252] [ T201] ? rtnl_dev_get+0xac/0x140 [ 40.457259] [ T201] ? __pfx_rtnl_dev_get+0x10/0x10 [ 40.457285] [ T201] __rtnl_newlink+0x22c/0xa50 [ 40.457305] [ T201] rtnl_newlink+0x637/0xb20 Adding rcu_read_lock() for all hsr_for_each_port() looks confusing. Introduce a new helper, hsr_for_each_port_rtnl(), that assumes the RTNL lock is held. This allows callers in suitable contexts to iterate ports safely without explicit RCU locking. Other code paths that rely on RCU protection continue to use hsr_for_each_port() with rcu_read_lock(). ==================== Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250905091533.377443-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
37 additions
and
18 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters