[BZ #535]

2004-11-09  Paul Eggert  <eggert@cs.ucla.edu.
	[BZ #535]
	* time/difftime.c: Fix a double-rounding bug on hosts with
	64-bit time_t and long double being IEEE double.  Also, port
	to more valid C99 hosts, even those that have padding bits.
	Don't include <values.h> since it is marked as an obsolescent
	interface.  Include <limits.h>, <float.h>, and <stdint.h> instead.
	(TYPE_BITS, TYPE_FLOATING, TYPE_SIGNED): New macros.
	(subtract): New static function, that works correctly without
	double-rounding, even on hosts with 64-bit time_t.  Also cater
	to hosts with padding bits.
	(__difftime): Use it.  Use DBL_MANT_DIG and LDBL_MANT_DIG to
	determine whether floating types are wide enough: the old
	test (which used sizeof) could in theory report the wrong results
	on hosts with padding bits in floating-point values.

ChangeLog

@@ -1,3 +1,20 @@
+2004-11-09  Paul Eggert  <eggert@cs.ucla.edu.
+
+	[BZ #535]
+	* time/difftime.c: Fix a double-rounding bug on hosts with
+	64-bit time_t and long double being IEEE double.  Also, port
+	to more valid C99 hosts, even those that have padding bits.
+	Don't include <values.h> since it is marked as an obsolescent
+	interface.  Include <limits.h>, <float.h>, and <stdint.h> instead.
+	(TYPE_BITS, TYPE_FLOATING, TYPE_SIGNED): New macros.
+	(subtract): New static function, that works correctly without
+	double-rounding, even on hosts with 64-bit time_t.  Also cater
+	to hosts with padding bits.
+	(__difftime): Use it.  Use DBL_MANT_DIG and LDBL_MANT_DIG to
+	determine whether floating types are wide enough: the old
+	test (which used sizeof) could in theory report the wrong results
+	on hosts with padding bits in floating-point values.
+
 2004-11-11  Simon Josefsson  <jas@extundo.com>
 
 	[BZ #542]

time/difftime.c

@@ -16,52 +16,107 @@
    Software Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA
    02111-1307 USA.  */
 
+/* Written by Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>.  */
+
 #include <time.h>
-#include <values.h>
 
+#include <limits.h>
+#include <float.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+#define TYPE_BITS(type) (sizeof (type) * CHAR_BIT)
+#define TYPE_FLOATING(type) ((type) 0.5 == 0.5)
+#define TYPE_SIGNED(type) ((type) -1 < 0)
+
+/* Return the difference between TIME1 and TIME0, where TIME0 <= TIME1.
+   time_t is known to be an integer type.  */
+
+static double
+subtract (time_t time1, time_t time0)
+{
+  if (! TYPE_SIGNED (time_t))
+    return time1 - time0;
+  else
+    {
+      /* Optimize the common special cases where time_t
+	 can be converted to uintmax_t without losing information.  */
+      uintmax_t dt = (uintmax_t) time1 - (uintmax_t) time0;
+      double delta = dt;
+
+      if (UINTMAX_MAX / 2 < INTMAX_MAX)
+	{
+	  /* This is a rare host where uintmax_t has padding bits, and possibly
+	     information was lost when converting time_t to uintmax_t.
+	     Check for overflow by comparing dt/2 to (time1/2 - time0/2).
+	     Overflow occurred if they differ by more than a small slop.
+	     Thanks to Clive D.W. Feather for detailed technical advice about
+	     hosts with padding bits.
+
+	     In the following code the "h" prefix means half.  By range
+	     analysis, we have:
+
+                  -0.5 <= ht1 - 0.5*time1 <= 0.5
+                  -0.5 <= ht0 - 0.5*time0 <= 0.5
+                  -1.0 <= dht - 0.5*(time1 - time0) <= 1.0
+
+             If overflow has not occurred, we also have:
+
+                  -0.5 <= hdt - 0.5*(time1 - time0) <= 0
+                  -1.0 <= dht - hdt <= 1.5
+
+             and since dht - hdt is an integer, we also have:
+
+                  -1 <= dht - hdt <= 1
+
+             or equivalently:
+
+                  0 <= dht - hdt + 1 <= 2
+
+             In the above analysis, all the operators have their exact
+             mathematical semantics, not C semantics.  However, dht - hdt +
+             1 is unsigned in C, so it need not be compared to zero.  */
+
+	  uintmax_t hdt = dt / 2;
+	  time_t ht1 = time1 / 2;
+	  time_t ht0 = time0 / 2;
+	  time_t dht = ht1 - ht0;
+
+	  if (2 < dht - hdt + 1)
+	    {
+	      /* Repair delta overflow.
+
+		 The following expression contains a second rounding,
+		 so the result may not be the closest to the true answer.
+		 This problem occurs only with very large differences.
+		 It's too painful to fix this portably.  */
+
+	      delta = dt + 2.0L * (UINTMAX_MAX - UINTMAX_MAX / 2);
+	    }
+	}
+
+      return delta;
+    }
+}
 
 /* Return the difference between TIME1 and TIME0.  */
 double
-__difftime (time1, time0)
-     time_t time1;
-     time_t time0;
+__difftime (time_t time1, time_t time0)
 {
-  /* Algorithm courtesy Paul Eggert (eggert@twinsun.com).  */
-
-  time_t delta, hibit;
+  /* Convert to double and then subtract if no double-rounding error could
+     result.  */
 
-  if (sizeof (time_t) < sizeof (double))
+  if (TYPE_BITS (time_t) <= DBL_MANT_DIG
+      || (TYPE_FLOATING (time_t) && sizeof (time_t) < sizeof (long double)))
     return (double) time1 - (double) time0;
-  if (sizeof (time_t) < sizeof (long double))
+
+  /* Likewise for long double.  */
+
+  if (TYPE_BITS (time_t) <= LDBL_MANT_DIG || TYPE_FLOATING (time_t))
     return (long double) time1 - (long double) time0;
 
-  if (time1 < time0)
-    return - __difftime (time0, time1);
-
-  /* As much as possible, avoid loss of precision by computing the
-    difference before converting to double.  */
-  delta = time1 - time0;
-  if (delta >= 0)
-    return delta;
-
-  /* Repair delta overflow.  */
-  hibit = (~ (time_t) 0) << (_TYPEBITS (time_t) - 1);
-
-  /* The following expression rounds twice, which means the result may not
-     be the closest to the true answer.  For example, suppose time_t is
-     64-bit signed int, long_double is IEEE 754 double with default
-     rounding, time1 = 9223372036854775807 and time0 = -1536.  Then the
-     true difference is 9223372036854777343, which rounds to
-     9223372036854777856 with a total error of 513.  But delta overflows to
-     -9223372036854774273, which rounds to -9223372036854774784, and
-     correcting this by subtracting 2 * (long_double) hibit (i.e. by adding
-     2**64 = 18446744073709551616) yields 9223372036854776832, which rounds
-     to 9223372036854775808 with a total error of 1535 instead.  This
-     problem occurs only with very large differences.  It's too painful to
-     fix this portably.  We are not alone in this problem; many C compilers
-     round twice when converting large unsigned types to small floating
-     types, so if time_t is unsigned the "return delta" above has the same
-     double-rounding problem.  */
-  return delta - 2 * (long double) hibit;
+  /* Subtract the smaller integer from the larger, convert the difference to
+     double, and then negate if needed.  */
+
+  return time1 < time0 ? - subtract (time0, time1) : subtract (time1, time0);
 }
 strong_alias (__difftime, difftime)