-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
f2fs: fix roll-forward missing scenarios
We can summarize the roll forward recovery scenarios as follows. [Term] F: fsync_mark, D: dentry_mark 1. inode(x) | CP | inode(x) | dnode(F) -> Update the latest inode(x). 2. inode(x) | CP | inode(F) | dnode(F) -> No problem. 3. inode(x) | CP | dnode(F) | inode(x) -> Recover to the latest dnode(F), and drop the last inode(x) 4. inode(x) | CP | dnode(F) | inode(F) -> No problem. 5. CP | inode(x) | dnode(F) -> The inode(DF) was missing. Should drop this dnode(F). 6. CP | inode(DF) | dnode(F) -> No problem. 7. CP | dnode(F) | inode(DF) -> If f2fs_iget fails, then goto next to find inode(DF). 8. CP | dnode(F) | inode(x) -> If f2fs_iget fails, then goto next to find inode(DF). But it will fail due to no inode(DF). So, this patch adds some missing points such as #1, #5, #7, and #8. Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
- Loading branch information
Jaegeuk Kim
committed
Sep 23, 2014
1 parent
88bd02c
commit 441ac5c
Showing
1 changed file
with
60 additions
and
11 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters