Rather than using a C implementation of memmove, directly call memmov…

…e, which typically has a much faster optimized implementation.
git-mirror · Feb 27, 2015 · af96be3 · af96be3
1 parent ddcf679
commit af96be3
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions.
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-02-27  Wilco Dijkstra  wdijkstr@arm.com
+
+	* string/bcopy.c (bcopy): Call memmove for performance.
+
 2015-02-27  Wilco Dijkstra  wdijkstr@arm.com
 
 	* string/bzero.c (__bzero): Call memset for performance.

diff --git a/string/bcopy.c b/string/bcopy.c
@@ -17,12 +17,8 @@
 
 #include <string.h>
 
-#define	memmove		bcopy
-#define	rettype		void
-#define	RETURN(s)	return
-#define	a1		src
-#define	a1const		const
-#define	a2		dest
-#define	a2const
-
-#include <string/memmove.c>
+void
+bcopy (const void *src, void *dest, size_t len)
+{
+  memmove (dest, src, len);
+}